Voodoo tattoo st kilda, we accept the love we think we deserve tattoo, van gogh starry night tattoo,

Angeleah · Guest

Im confused about why they would put it on craigslist? How would they know to look on craigslist?..I thought that just worked on Dexter.
DIE FOR DETHKLOK!!!

Jollymore · Guest

“Woo Hoo - I get to be the first to bury DavidNiven's idiocy on this thread!

Thasleena · Guest

So does Android. It's the same OS across the board. It's not like Linux where there are many distributions. It's one os with the same standards. If the app works on one android device it's going to work on every other one as well. So think instead of your app only being on 1 phone it can be on many different phones..
I'm just glad the officer got reinstated. Would be a shame if his life was ruined by some ***** on a power trip.!

Margarita · Guest

Not really, but it sure makes it easier to rent.?
This particular design is insulting only because the concept is literally a model of two concentric spheres and a tube. Throw in a decent render and *BAM* it'll get a page or two in popular mechanics.While we're on the subject: its 2009, where's my flying car?

Showing · Guest

Reminds me of "The Oil-for-Food Programme" introduced by the Clinton administration. The only people being helped by these types of programs are us: cheaper gas prices.

Tiarali · Guest

Glad to see people are interested. Ok, just to hammer home the Einstein new timeline flaw. As a general rule of time travel, going into the future does not cause a new timeline to be spawned. I could prove this with real world examples (such as the twin paradox, or the fact that we are all time traveling forward as the natural progression of things) but since we're talking about this chart, I will prove by contradiction. Look at the two future jumps made by Marty: First one in Timeline 2 from Nov 12, 1955 to Oc 26 1985, second from Sep 7 1885 to Oct 27 1985. These (correctly) do not show a new timeline being spawned as a result of future travel. So, either these lines are wrong or the single Einstein event is wrong. Moving on from that though, I am bothered by the representation of the timelines as linear from start to finish. For the sake of this next argument, let us consider only the scope of these time travel events on the chart. In this context, all travel happens to, fro the dates Jan 1, 1885 and Oct 21, 2015. Since no time travel events happen before Jan 1, 1885 all of the timelines on the chart really share the same timeline before Jan 1, 1885. They are rooted in a common timeline. The chart shows 9 timelines either extending back infinite or being instantiated at the destination point of each event. This is misleading and confusing since it obscures the branching context of the new timeline. Most of the problems I have with this chart can be resolved by moving towards a branching model. Ok so thats all the time I have this morning. If anyone is still reading this thread, let me know what you think.

Steelo · Guest

***** that! I'll take Gates, because you know that son of a bitch has a bathroom somewhere in his house with $100 bills on a roll instead of toilet paper.

Bijoy · Guest

!

video of getting a tattoo